Version: 9.5
Featuring: Photoshoot #011
Uptime: March 18 2007 - current
 Credits: Click here

Comments: Geez louise, no! No no no no! Ahh. That is all I have to say on this... dribble.

Version: 8.3
Featuring: Photoshoot #017
Uptime: March 3 - March 18 2007
Credits: Click here

Comments: Shoot me now - I actually liked the header. I know most were disappointed with this one, it was too safe and unimpressive (not to mention the overbearing redness), and I'm not one to disagree - but I still really do like the header itself. The setup? Absolutely terrible, some of the worst I've done.

Unfortunately, no snapshot of V. 7 is available.

Version: 6.2
Featuring: Photoshoot #017
Uptime: October 23 2006 - January 2007
Credits: Click here

Comments: This design was a whole new style endeavor for me - and it worked surprisingly well. I got bored of it in the end, and felt it would've needed more fine tuning, but at least it was a breath of fresh air of sorts.

Version: 5.4
Featuring: Photoshoot #017
Uptime: October 14 - Octber 23 2006
Credits: Click here

Comments: Three bad layouts in a row - that's bordering my record! I was having a major creativity block around this time, and I simply ended up trying too hard. That's pretty much what this "design" represents - trying too hard. It was the last layout under which Hugh-Jackman.com was called Jackman Connection.

Version: 4.1
Featuring: Photoshoot #017
Uptime: September 17 - October 14 2006
Credits: Click here

Comments: This one isn't much of an improvement from the previous design. In fact - it's worse. It's too monochrome and plain, and I'm actually loathing the effects. This one didn't even last one month.

Version: 3.1
Featuring: Photoshoot #017
Uptime: August 28 - September 17 2006
Credits: Click here

Comments: Terrible. Just - terrible. It was bad right down to color choices and effects. I have nothing else to say on this one.

Version: 2.2
Featuring: Photoshoot #006
Uptime: April 17 - August 28 2006
Credits: Click here

Comments: I hate to admit it but I always liked this one. Although I got rather bored of it towards the end, I always liked the effects I used, although the setup was in retrospect rather... flawed. It's these little things that irk me in this one.

Version: 1.6
Featuring: DNA Magazine-photoshoot
Uptime: February 5 - April 17 2006
Credits: Click here

Comments: This was an okay look for a first layout, but it's rather plain, isn't it? I fought with this one for the longest time, and yet I was never quite pleased with it. I can do better than this. It's a shame, because I love this picture of him.

return to previous page